AI is reshaping how buyers find, evaluate, and pay you. We audit where you stand. We build the dashboards that show what is working and what is not.
We probe your live site directly. No surveys, no questionnaires. You get a 0–100 score per rubric, a confidence rating on every measurement, and the raw evidence.
Every finding is scored by Impact × Confidence × Ease. Sprint 1 is what to ship this week. Every row carries a verify-yourself line so you can confirm the fix worked yourself. Most take just minutes.
Schema, meta, robots, canonical, sitemap, and content drafts (plus llms.txt as zero-cost hygiene). Implemented as a reviewable pull request in your repo when you grant access, or handed off as a spec for your team. Either way, you merge, deploy, and ship. We re-audit to confirm the improvement.
Every engagement starts with an audit. Where it goes next depends on what we find.
Traditional search, AI citation, agent-readiness, design, voice, responsive, brand. The work we're known for.
Structured renewal, churn, and pushback tracking that gets sharper every quarter. We build the system. You keep it.
When the engagement reveals what to track, we build the dashboard. Hosted and maintained. Follow-on, not starting point.
How we measure AI market readiness. Visibility is weighted slightly higher because if AI and search cannot surface you, none of the credibility work is ever seen. Both still have to be there. Agent-Readiness is the newest rubric and most agencies do not run it yet.
Default weighting. Tile size is each rubric's share of the 100-point score. The split is tuned by industry: Visibility leads for SaaS and B2B, Credibility leads for hospitality and creator brands. It runs roughly 42 to 54 percent Visibility.
On AEO hype: some shops sell llms.txt, content chunking, and AI-specific schema as the way to get cited. Google explicitly disclaims them as AI-search levers and has confirmed it has no plans to support llms.txt. We ship them where they cost nothing (non-Google engines may parse them) and weight them near zero. The lift comes from the foundational SEO and crawlability Google says actually drives AI visibility. Standards-based, measurable, durable.
Why citation matters: industry data shared at Google I/O 2026 put brands cited in AI Overviews at roughly 35% more organic clicks than uncited competitors. Third-party data, not our promise. It is why citation eligibility is worth measuring, and we earn it with the foundational SEO that drives it.
Crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals, security headers, backlinks.
Will ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews cite your page?
Crawler access control, semantic HTML, MCP cards, OpenAPI, OAuth discovery, commerce protocols.
Visual hierarchy, conversion UX, accessibility, trust signals, perceived speed.
Clarity, persuasion architecture, clear structure, original expertise, CTA copy.
Palette, typography, identity, voice compliance, consistency across pages.
Layout integrity and tap-target safety across six real viewports.
Sample scorecard
ILLUSTRATIVE. EVERY AUDIT PRODUCES THIS ACROSS SEVEN RUBRICS
Priced after we see your site and scope the work. Request the sample first. Decide if we're worth a conversation.
What every prospect asks before the first call.
We audited a B2B SaaS against all seven rubrics. Same probe, same scoring, same deliverable you'd get.